I saw this today……

Yes, Peta is made up of genuinely illogical and somewhat pathetic individuals, however I think this is blown out of proportions. The "breasts" that you people rant and rave about are crudely animated pictures of woman in bras below hte neck and above the waist. It literally has Pac-Man grade animation.

And whoever the fuck said that the FCC and the PTC should deal with this, fuck you! if you want the federal government to intrude into every aspect of our lives that you goddamn bible-thumpers find offensive we're not that far off from nazi America.

Don't think that PETA isn't appropriate for children? Don't let your children see it!!!
Dumbasses

Peta, you are sick, sick, sick, SICK motherf***ers promoting violence (Your Mama/Daddy Kills Animals with their gory, R rated covers and a picture of a dead animal with no skin and blood all over on the inside of the Mama kills Animals Pamphlet) and now, sex to our innocent children, I only wonder what the FCC and Parents Telivision Council would say to you if they saw your gory pamphlets, the gorifying of a copyrighted video game character (Cooking Mama), and now THIS sick sh*t…. You know what they would say? F*** YOU PETA!!!! That's what they would say, ad then they would shut this orginization down for good, protecting our children from the vulgar content of Petas petitions and programs!

Technically, if Jesus didn’t want breast cancer around, one would think that, rather than promoting research of any stripe, he would simply wave his magical wand and cause breast cancer not to exist anymore. Or, heck, use that whole “omnipotence” doohicky of his to cause it never to have existed in the first place! Retroactively!

Cancer research requires multiple trials over short periods. Lab rats mature in a matter of weeks, and multiple generations can be tested and observed within a year. Testing of all cancer drugs on humans only would slow treatment development from a matter of a couple of years to decades or longer, and result in the torturous and unnecessary cancer deaths of hundreds of thousands of women.

PETA clearly prefers vermin over humans, and would like to see as many humans die of cancer as possible.

I wonder if they will refuse treatments tested on animals when one of them gets cancer?

Not only is the game sexist, the message is also anti-woman. I’ve never been more offended in my life!

Do you deny that this information is true?

http://www.petakillsanimals.com/petasdirtysecret.cfm

http://www.petakillsanimals.com/downloads/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf

How about this? http://www.consumerfreedom.com/downloads/reference/audio/010501_bruce_friedrich.wav

PETA vegetarian campaign director Bruce Friedrich encourages activists to commit arson against restaurants, medical laboratories, and banks.

As far as the Human Society goes:

http://www.petakillsanimals.com/news_detail.cfm?ID=3932 Have a look, Karla. While the Humane Society does operate animal shelters, they are also interested in putting an end to livestock agriculture and forcing veganism upon the American public . . . just like PETA.

Now, let’s double-check that against the Humane Society’s website!

http://www.hsus.org/farm/

This section damns all animal agriculture and promotes veganism. What does this have to do with helping neglected animals? It seems to have a lot to do with helping the soy industry, in spite of the toxic side effects on many people of diets high in soy!

Interestingly, the link you provide gives no information whatsoever about a campaign against MADD, other than to say there was one. I did find this:

http://alcoholfacts.org/CrashCourseOnMADD.html

MADD recognizes that the problem of drunken driving has now largely been reduced to a “hard core of alcoholics who do not respond to public appeal.” Most drivers who have had something to drink have low blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and few are involved in fatal accidents or crashes. On the other hand, while only a few drivers have BAC’s higher than .15, many of those drivers have fatal crashes. For example, almost half of fatally injured drunk drivers have a BAC of .16 (which is twice the legal limit) or higher.

The biggest problem in reducing drunk driving fatalities now consists of the hard core of alcoholic drivers who repeatedly drive with BAC’s of .15 or higher. But MADD has now decided to go after social drinkers and to eliminate driving after drinking any amount of alcohol beverage. This change appears to reflect the influence of a growing neo-prohibitionist movement within MADD.

Do you think that the government has the right to tell us what to do in every aspect of our lives, Karla?