Long known for bizarre ad campaigns, PETA has taken the unusual step of encouraging children to grasp strange women’s breasts in a new online game. Check it out . . . But keep your kids away!
In their latest campaign, PETA targets the use of animals in research to save the lives of women who get breast cancer. That’s right, they have moved from complaining about people eating tasty animals to trying to stop research to cure breast cancer, one of the leading causes of death for women in Western nations!
http://www.peta2.com/BreastsNotAnimalTests/game.asp
In the “Breasts not Animal Tests” game, players are forced to choose between grabbing the scantily-clad breasts of women of multiple races, or laying hold of a nice couple of pears, two juicy, ripe mangoes, a forlorn hooter, a lonely bitch (that is, female dog), or other depraved sexual innuendoes too revolting to mention. Not only is it perverse, it also encourages young men to grab the dirty pillows of strange women!
We can only imagine the number of teenage boys home M-ing with their friends to this “game”.
May the good Lord Himself direct His Holy Wrath toward these disgusting, perverted PETArdz!
Related posts:
- Children’s Game Promotes Homosexual Marriage Milton-Bradley's Game of Life has gotten a modern, online makeover. What's new? It's electronic. It's online. It has neat graphics. Oh, and it promotes homosexual...
- Pray Carrie Prejean Beats Child Porn Rap Carrie Prejean, Miss USA runner-up and spokesmodel for the Traditional Marriage movement, is now facing allegations of child pornography. Pray that she beats the rap!...
This is disgusting! What’s wrong with those people?
Not only do they hate and kill animals, they hate women, too? They want men to treat us as sex objects AND they want us to die of breast cancer?!
There are so many good organisations (like Keep A Breast Foundation) that go the right way and do not support animal testing but use there money for better research methods. I’m certain Jesus would love the compassionate choice of not harming animals and fighting the breast cancer disease with smarter methods. The animal testing industry is greedy and not very compassioned.
If the game is the right tool to educate about this, don’t know. But it’s important to make a kind and compassioned decision when donating to brest cancer organisations: make sure they don’t support animal testing!
Oh, and BTW the people who put up the petakillsanimals website are also campaigning against “Humane Society of the United States”, “Mothers Against Drunk Driving” and other groups: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Center_for_Consumer_Freedom
Karla, I appreciate your concerns. However, you are here attacking the messenger instead of the message.
Do you deny that this information is true?
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/petasdirtysecret.cfm
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/downloads/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf
How about this? http://www.consumerfreedom.com/downloads/reference/audio/010501_bruce_friedrich.wav
As far as the Human Society goes:
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/news_detail.cfm?ID=3932 Have a look, Karla. While the Humane Society does operate animal shelters, they are also interested in putting an end to livestock agriculture and forcing veganism upon the American public . . . just like PETA.
Now, let’s double-check that against the Humane Society’s website!
http://www.hsus.org/farm/
This section damns all animal agriculture and promotes veganism. What does this have to do with helping neglected animals? It seems to have a lot to do with helping the soy industry, in spite of the toxic side effects on many people of diets high in soy!
Interestingly, the link you provide gives no information whatsoever about a campaign against MADD, other than to say there was one. I did find this:
http://alcoholfacts.org/CrashCourseOnMADD.html
Do you think that the government has the right to tell us what to do in every aspect of our lives, Karla?
@Karla:
Technically, if Jesus didn’t want breast cancer around, one would think that, rather than promoting research of any stripe, he would simply wave his magical wand and cause breast cancer not to exist anymore. Or, heck, use that whole “omnipotence” doohicky of his to cause it never to have existed in the first place! Retroactively!
Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death in American women. In fact, 22% of American women will die of cancer. http://www.cdc.gov/Women/lcod.htm
Cancer research requires multiple trials over short periods. Lab rats mature in a matter of weeks, and multiple generations can be tested and observed within a year. Testing of all cancer drugs on humans only would slow treatment development from a matter of a couple of years to decades or longer, and result in the torturous and unnecessary cancer deaths of hundreds of thousands of women.
PETA clearly prefers vermin over humans, and would like to see as many humans die of cancer as possible.
I wonder if they will refuse treatments tested on animals when one of them gets cancer?
Not only is the game sexist, the message is also anti-woman. I’ve never been more offended in my life!
the autoplay vid on http://www.keep-a-breast.org/ is just as sexist, but against men (so that’s okay!). every man in the vid plays a boobie-obsessed idiot, and they specifically deny that a man can get breast cancer, which is false.
I agree that a lot of Peta’s campaigning can be taken as sexist and pornographic. My understanding is that they use shock tactics to create publicity and attention, a tactic that has worked for them in the past. As a vegetarian and animal lover, it makes me sad that since Peta’s campaigns are offensive to many the message of how we treat animals does not get across.